Energy Insurance Training Course

Course Overview

This comprehensive professional development program is designed for Executives and managers handling various functions and operations at oil and gas terminals, Senior leadership of organizations who need to thoroughly understand energy insurance, Policymakers and managers involved in securing and reviewing all related policies for the organization including insurance, Internal and external auditors and safety managers checking for compliance with all required standards and guidelines of safety, Insurers who need to understand the needs of the insurance buyer, Legal and financial officers playing key roles in decision making and fund management, and Any other professional interested in knowing more about energy insurance responsible for implementing energy insurance excellence across Beris International captive insurance program design for oil and gas operators retaining predictable loss layers while transferring catastrophic exposures to reinsurance and capital markets, Beris International upstream energy insurance OEE control-of-well and pollution liability and physical damage and general liability coverage placement for deepwater E&P operations, and J.S. Held forensic accounting and business interruption claims management for major oil refinery fire losses in multi-organizational contexts. The program addresses proven practices in captive insurance structure design and risk retention layer optimization and catastrophe bond and collateralized reinsurance gateway mechanics, Mark Braly of Beris International upstream energy insurance OEE policy limit adequacy analysis from USD 50 million for conventional onshore wells to USD 500 million or more for deepwater blowout catastrophic exposures, and Peter Hagen CPA CFF of J.S. Held forensic accounting business interruption back-casting methodology and linear programming LP model projected normal revenues quantification for USD 500 million plus refinery fire BI claims where Beris International confirmed that the captive segment now includes more than 10,000 risk-bearing entities that write about USD 62 billion in direct premiums each year as a sign that many large buyers are taking more control of their own risk financing through captive insurance structures and that a well-run single parent captive structure maintained a five-year average combined ratio of about 83 percent compared with roughly 100 percent for commercial casualty peers, Mark Braly confirming that OEE policies typically cover expenses incurred until the well is killed and secured and that some forms extend to redrilling costs when the original wellbore becomes unusable and that limits often range from USD 50 million for conventional onshore wells to USD 500 million or more for deepwater operations and that standard CGL policies exclude pollution requiring separate environmental impairment liability or pollution legal liability forms that respond to both sudden releases and gradual contamination covering cleanup costs and third-party claims and natural resource damages, and Peter Hagen CPA CFF confirming that an oil refinery in the United States suffered a major fire shutting down its Ultra Reformer UU3 which converted naphtha to high-octane reformate for use as gasoline base stock and hydrogen and LPG for more than six months and that the insured presented a business interruption claim in excess of USD 500 million and that the J.S. Held forensic accounting experts measured more than USD 100 million less in losses than the claim stated with the primary difference being in the Projected Normal Revenues the first and most critical measurement in BI claims which analyzes what revenues would have been but for the loss.​

The curriculum integrates Broad Risks in Oil and Gas Industry, Types of Offshore Energy Risks, Types of Onshore Risks, Risk Control Techniques, Benefits of Scale in Risk Management, Risk Transfer Mechanisms, Challenges of the Energy Industry, Energy Insurance Placement in the Market, Adjustments by Insurance Buyers and Risk Intermediaries and Insurers, Important Aspects of an Insurance Policy, Factors Affecting Insurance Costs in Oil and Gas, and Various Coverage Options to provide comprehensive coverage of energy insurance principles, captive insurance structure and upstream E&P coverage and business interruption claims management methodologies, and risk transfer mechanisms and energy insurance placement and coverage gap analysis integration domains for achieving energy insurance excellence.

Why This Course Is Required?

Captive insurance structure design and risk retention layer optimization represents a critical competency where Beris International confirmed that a captive is an insurance or reinsurance company formed and owned by the company or group whose risks it insures and that in oil and gas this usually means a single parent captive owned by a holding company or a joint venture captive for a pipeline or LNG project or an industry group captive that aggregates the risks of multiple smaller service firms and that instead of sending every premium dollar to the commercial market the owner pays part of the premium into the captive with the captive then paying claims within a defined layer and purchasing reinsurance where it makes sense and returning any underwriting profit and investment income to the owner confirming that this model has scaled into a global industry including more than 10,000 risk-bearing entities and roughly USD 62 billion in direct premiums each year. Upstream energy insurance OEE policy limit adequacy and coverage gap analysis demands specialized knowledge where Mark Braly of Beris International confirmed that a single offshore platform might represent USD 500 million in replacement cost while a blowout could trigger pollution liabilities that dwarf the physical damage itself and that standard commercial property policies exclude drilling rigs and production platforms and subsea infrastructure with upstream property forms providing named-peril or all-risk coverage for these specialized assets and that pollution coverage deserves special attention because standard CGL policies exclude pollution requiring separate coverage through environmental impairment liability or pollution legal liability forms that respond to both sudden releases and gradual contamination. J.S. Held forensic accounting BI back-casting and LP model variance quantification requires professionals with forensic financial claims management expertise where Peter Hagen confirmed that refineries do not depend on budgets but are driven by linear programming LP models run at the beginning of every month when the refinery projects inputs in crude and outputs in saleable products allowing planners to identify the optimal mix of crude oil to process and products to produce based on market demands and unit constraints and that by definition an LP model is going to overstate the but-for revenues in a given month with the J.S. Held team looking at several clean months pre-fire where the refinery was running at capacity and without operational issues to project a variance from the LP model using back-casting.​

Energy insurance professionals must master broad risks in oil and gas industry fundamentals including political risks and geological risks and price risks and supply and demand risks and cost risks, understand comprehensive types of offshore and onshore energy risks and risk control techniques and benefits of scale in risk management frameworks including weather perils and marine perils and drilling perils and production perils and political risks and property damage and boiler explosion and machinery breakdown and business interruption and safety programs and security systems and fire suppression and construction material check and pre-employment screening and diversification and financing and expertise and products, and apply proper risk transfer mechanisms and energy industry challenges and energy insurance placement and adjustments and important policy aspects and insurance cost factors and coverage options methods including captive insurance companies and catastrophe bonds and derivatives and insurance and self-insurance and dynamic business models and globalized environment and human capital management and climate change and environmental care and impact of new technology and tender quotation and broker selection and lead underwriter selection and broker’s placing slip and line authorization and closing and final signing and final policy wording and energy industry business requirement and current risk management methodologies and energy insurance market trading conditions and loss control and safety and claims management and financial analysis and production level and operations size and payroll and storage type and management experience and resident state of operations and umbrella liability and professional liability and inland marine liability to ensure organizations achieve superior captive insurance structure underwriting profit retention and enhanced OEE and pollution liability and physical damage coverage gap prevention and improved BI forensic accounting claims quantification accuracy and competitive advantage through continuous risk transfer optimization and insurance placement and claims management governance protocols.

Research demonstrates training is crucial for success, with the Beris International captive insurance analysis showing that energy insurance professionals who understand captive structures and risk retention layers and reinsurance placement and catastrophe bond mechanics can design sophisticated cost-effective risk financing frameworks that go well beyond standard market placement opening senior advisory and risk financing roles at major E&P companies and insurers, while the upstream energy insurance overview confirming that professionals who can read and interpret OEE and pollution liability and physical damage and general liability policy forms and understand why standard commercial policies exclude pollution risks requiring separate coverage can identify coverage gaps before losses occur protecting their organizations from catastrophic uninsured exposures, and the J.S. Held refinery BI case demonstrating that insurance and finance professionals who understand the mechanics of business interruption coverage including period of indemnity and gross profit calculation and increased cost of working and contingent BI can lead or support claims of exceptional complexity and value making them indispensable to their organizations during and after major loss events.​

Course Objectives

Upon successful completion, participants will have demonstrated mastery of:

• Acquiring detailed knowledge and information about energy insurance in the oil and gas industry including upstream offshore and downstream onshore coverage structures
• Making the right decisions when selecting insurance plans for an organization by understanding OEE control-of-well limits from USD 50 million for conventional onshore to USD 500 million for deepwater and pollution liability and physical damage and general liability coverage gap analysis​
• Devising suitable and customizable insurance plans on behalf of insurers including captive insurance structures retaining predictable loss layers while transferring catastrophic exposures via catastrophe bonds and collateralized reinsurance​
• Reviewing and analyzing and predicting and covering all possible risks offshore and onshore through insurance to avoid financial losses including BI back-casting LP model variance quantification for major fire claims​
• Coaching other professionals on important features of energy insurance including captive structure design and OEE policy literacy and BI claims mechanics
• Thoroughly reading through insurance policies before entering agreements with insurers to identify gaps including pollution exclusions in standard CGL policies requiring separate environmental impairment liability forms​
• Finding innovative ways to minimize insurance costs through captive underwriting profit and investment income retention converting insurance expenditure into a long-term financial advantage​

Master energy insurance excellence and drive captive insurance structure optimization and OEE coverage gap prevention and BI claims management success. Enroll today to become a Certified Energy Insurance Professional!

Training Methodology

This Energy Insurance Training Course comprises the following training methods:

The training framework includes:

• Audio-visual presentations delivered by highly experienced professionals from the relevant energy insurance domain for easy reference
• Role-plays and group projects and case study discussions and experience sharing developing practical skills in captive insurance structure design and OEE limit adequacy analysis and BI claims quantification
• Case studies including Beris International captive insurance program design for oil and gas operators with USD 62 billion captive market context and Beris International upstream energy insurance OEE and pollution liability coverage placement for deepwater blowout exposures exceeding USD 1 billion and J.S. Held oil refinery fire USD 500 million BI back-casting claims management​
• Participative sessions encouraging all participants to engage with energy insurance placement tender quotation and broker selection and lead underwriter selection and closing and final policy wording scenarios

This immersive approach fosters practical skill development and real-world application of energy insurance principles through comprehensive coverage of broad oil and gas risks and offshore and onshore risk types and risk control techniques and benefits of scale and risk transfer mechanisms and energy industry challenges and insurance placement and adjustments and important policy aspects and insurance cost factors and coverage options domains with emphasis on measurable captive underwriting profit retention and coverage gap prevention and BI claims quantification accuracy.

This program follows the Do-Review-Learn-Apply model, creating a structured learning journey that transforms traditional energy insurance approaches into professional energy insurance excellence.

Who Should Attend?

This Energy Insurance Training Course is designed for:

• Executives and managers handling various functions and operations at oil and gas terminals
• Senior leadership of organizations who need to thoroughly understand energy insurance
• Policymakers and managers involved in securing and reviewing all related policies for the organization including insurance
• Internal and external auditors and safety managers checking for compliance with all required standards and guidelines of safety
• Insurers who need to understand the needs of the insurance buyer
• Legal and financial officers playing key roles in decision making and fund management
• Any other professional interested in knowing more about energy insurance

Organizational Benefits

Organizations implementing energy insurance training will benefit through:

• Significantly enhanced captive insurance structure design capability through comprehensive training delivering measurable risk financing returns where Beris International confirmed that single parent captives maintained a five-year average combined ratio of about 83 percent compared with roughly 100 percent for commercial casualty peers and that new captives under management in 2024 retained more than 55 percent of the incremental premiums written showing that owners are using captives as core risk retention tools not just paper vehicles and that the insurance-linked securities market reached record capacity with about USD 107 billion outstanding in 2024 with captives increasingly exploring these instruments as part of their risk financing mix including catastrophe bonds and collateralized reinsurance for peak exposures, directly reflecting the course’s modules on risk transfer mechanisms and benefits of scale in risk management and factors affecting insurance costs and energy insurance placement​
• Better upstream energy insurance OEE and pollution liability and physical damage coverage optimization through Mark Braly of Beris International confirming that a single deepwater platform blowout can trigger losses exceeding USD 1 billion across well control costs and environmental cleanup and third-party liability and business interruption and that OEE policy limits range from USD 50 million for conventional onshore wells to USD 500 million or more for deepwater and that limit adequacy analysis should consider worst-case scenarios not average losses and that pollution coverage requires separate environmental impairment liability or pollution legal liability forms separate from standard CGL policies which explicitly exclude pollution with these policies responding to both sudden releases and gradual contamination covering cleanup costs and third-party claims and natural resource damages​
• Improved BI claims forensic financial analysis capability through Peter Hagen CPA CFF of J.S. Held confirming that the insured presented a BI claim in excess of USD 500 million following fire damage and that the J.S. Held experts measured more than USD 100 million less in losses than the claim stated with the primary difference in Projected Normal Revenues the first and most critical measurement in BI claims using back-casting to look at several clean months pre-fire where the refinery was running at capacity and without operational issues to project a variance from the LP model and that the J.S. Held forensic accounting team along with the independent adjuster earned the respect of the insured due to knowledge of their operation and timeliness in providing monthly measures for advances and willingness to take a reasonable approach to loss measurements​
• Strengthened competitive advantage through useful and appropriate insurance policies covering all critical operational aspects and effective risk prediction and assessment and management preventing financial losses from physical damage or other risks and increased organizational credibility because of well-managed and well-covered risks and strong insurance policies and thorough review and scrutiny of insurance policies to check for gaps and minimal insurance costs handled by trained and experienced professionals

Studies show that organizations implementing comprehensive energy insurance training achieve significantly enhanced delivery outcomes as research confirms Beris International’s analysis showing that captives are no longer an enigma and have become a mainstream part of how many organizations structure their risk financing with the captive forming question no longer being whether captives are legitimate but when the economics and risk profile and corporate strategy line up so that forming or expanding a captive program becomes the logical next step reinforcing the course’s emphasis on risk transfer mechanisms and captive insurance companies and catastrophe bonds and derivatives and benefits of scale in risk management, better organizational outcomes through Mark Braly’s upstream energy insurance overview demonstrating that working with brokers who understand drilling operations and production systems and the unique hazards of E&P activities ensures coverage that actually responds when losses occur and that organizations should review their programs annually and update values as operations change and stress-test coverage against realistic loss scenarios confirming the organizational value of training professionals in types of offshore energy risks and risk control techniques and coverage options and energy insurance placement and scrutiny of insurance policies, and improved competitive positioning as Peter Hagen’s J.S. Held BI case confirms that without mutual respect between insurer experts and the insured it is likely the file would have remained open a great deal longer potentially in litigation with organizations benefiting from personnel who understand BI period of indemnity mechanics and gross profit calculation and LP model variance analysis and increased cost of working and forensic back-casting methodology.​

Empower your organization with energy insurance expertise. Enroll your team today and see the transformation in captive insurance structure optimization and OEE coverage gap prevention and BI claims management excellence!

Personal Benefits

Professionals implementing energy insurance training will benefit through:

• Deeper understanding of captive insurance structure mastery and risk financing value-addition through the Beris International captive analysis showing that energy insurance professionals who understand captive structures and risk retention layers and reinsurance placement and catastrophe bond mechanics can design sophisticated cost-effective risk financing frameworks that go well beyond standard market placement opening senior advisory and risk financing roles at major E&P companies and insurers, with the course’s modules on risk transfer mechanisms including captives and catastrophe bonds and derivatives alongside factors affecting insurance costs providing the conceptual and practical framework to develop these competencies​
• Enhanced upstream energy insurance OEE and coverage gap mastery and policy literacy value-addition through Mark Braly’s Beris International overview confirming that professionals who can read and interpret OEE and pollution liability and physical damage and general liability policy forms and understand why standard commercial policies exclude pollution risks requiring separate coverage can identify coverage gaps before losses occur protecting their organizations from catastrophic uninsured exposures, with the course’s modules on offshore energy risks and risk control techniques and coverage options and scrutiny of insurance policies building exactly this level of policy literacy and risk foresight​
• Stronger BI forensic financial analysis mastery and claims management value-addition through Peter Hagen’s J.S. Held refinery BI case demonstrating that insurance and finance professionals who understand the mechanics of BI coverage including period of indemnity and gross profit calculation and increased cost of working and contingent BI can lead or support claims of exceptional complexity and value making them indispensable to their organizations during and after major loss events, with the course’s modules on onshore risks and important aspects of an insurance policy including claims management and financial analysis and coverage options developing this practical claims knowledge​
• Advanced expertise in energy insurance principles, captive insurance structure and upstream E&P coverage and BI claims management methodologies, and risk transfer mechanisms and energy insurance placement and coverage gap analysis integration domains
• Enhanced career prospects and marketability in energy insurance brokerage, captive insurance program management, upstream E&P risk advisory, BI forensic accounting, OEE and pollution liability underwriting, and oil and gas risk management sectors with professionals gaining skills in captive structure feasibility assessment, OEE limit adequacy analysis, LP model BI back-casting variance quantification, catastrophe bond ILS gateway mechanics, and energy insurance tender quotation and broker selection and lead underwriter selection
• Complete understanding and detailed information about energy insurance in the oil and gas sector, and increased knowledge and experience to thoroughly review insurance policies and choose the most applicable plan for an organization
• Enhanced decision-making skills to undertake higher roles and responsibilities involving critical decision-making with regard to insurance cover and greater ability to contribute to organizational growth through sound insurance plans protecting the organization against all possible risks

Course Outline

The course covers the following topics regarding energy insurance:

Module 1: Broad Risks in Oil and Gas Industry

• Political risks
• Geological risks
• Price risks
• Supply and demand risks
• Cost risks
• Catastrophic single-event exposures versus attritional loss layers
• Risk aggregation across upstream midstream and downstream assets

Module 2: Types of Offshore Energy Risks

• Weather perils
• Marine perils
• Drilling perils
• Production perils
• Political risks
• Deepwater blowout exposures exceeding USD 1 billion across well control and pollution and BI
• Cyber and automation risk in connected offshore production systems

Module 3: Types of Onshore Risks

• Property damage
• Boiler explosion and machinery breakdown
• Business interruption
• LP model projected normal revenues and back-casting variance in refinery BI claims
• Contingent business interruption from upstream supply chain disruption

Module 4: Risk Control Techniques

• Safety programs
• Security systems
• Fire suppression
• Construction material check
• Pre-employment screening
• Annual program stress-testing against worst-case loss scenarios
• ESG and climate risk integration into energy risk control frameworks

Module 5: Benefits of Scale in Risk Management

• Diversification
• Financing
• Expertise
• Products
• Captive combined ratio of 83 percent versus 100 percent for commercial casualty peers
• ILS market USD 107 billion capacity and catastrophe bond gateway mechanics

Module 6: Risk Transfer Mechanisms

• Captive insurance companies
• Catastrophe bonds
• Derivatives
• Insurance
• Self-insurance
• Single parent and joint venture and group captive structure design
• Risk retention layer optimization and collateralized reinsurance placement

Module 7: Challenges of the Energy Industry

• Dynamic business models
• Globalised environment
• Human capital management
• Climate change and environmental care
• Impact of new technology
• Energy transition reshaping insurer appetite and underwriting criteria
• Cyber exposure from automated production systems and digital oilfield technology

Module 8: Energy Insurance Placement in the Market

• Tender quotation
• Broker selection
• Lead underwriter selection
• Broker’s placing slip
• Line authorisation
• Closing and final signing
• Final policy wording
• OEE limit adequacy analysis from USD 50 million onshore to USD 500 million deepwater
• Broker competency assessment for specialist E&P drilling and production coverage

Module 9: Adjustments by Insurance Buyers, Risk Intermediaries and Insurers

• Energy industry business requirement
• Current risk management methodologies
• Energy insurance market trading conditions
• Annual coverage review and asset value update obligations
• Market cycle hardening and softening impact on program structure

Module 10: Important Aspects of an Insurance Policy

• Loss control
• Safety
• Claims management
• Financial analysis
• Pollution exclusion in standard CGL and separate EIL and PLL form requirements
• BI period of indemnity and gross profit and increased cost of working mechanics

Module 11: Factors Affecting Insurance Costs in Oil and Gas

• Production level
• Operations size
• Payroll
• Storage type
• Management experience
• Resident state of operations
• Captive underwriting profit and investment income retention reducing net insurance cost
• Loss history and safety record impact on commercial market premium pricing

Module 12: Various Coverage Options

• Umbrella liability
• Professional liability
• Inland marine liability
• OEE control-of-well and physical damage and pollution liability coverage placement
• Natural resource damages and third-party claims under environmental impairment liability

Real World Examples

Beris International – Captive insurance programs in oil and gas: a USD 62 billion market

Implementation: Beris International confirmed in its 2025 analysis that the captive segment now includes more than 10,000 risk-bearing entities that write about USD 62 billion in direct premiums each year as a sign that many large buyers are taking more control of their own risk financing through captive insurance structures, with a captive defined as an insurance or reinsurance company formed and owned by the company or group whose risks it insures and in oil and gas usually meaning a single parent captive owned by a holding company or a joint venture captive for a pipeline or LNG project or an industry group captive that aggregates the risks of multiple smaller service firms. Instead of sending every premium dollar to the commercial market the owner pays part of the premium into the captive with the captive then paying claims within a defined layer and purchasing reinsurance where it makes sense and returning any underwriting profit and investment income to the owner, with single parent captives maintaining a five-year average combined ratio of about 83 percent compared with roughly 100 percent for commercial casualty peers and new captives under management in 2024 retaining more than 55 percent of the incremental premiums written showing that owners are using captives as core risk retention tools. The captive increasingly serves as a gateway to capital markets via catastrophe bonds and collateralized reinsurance for peak exposures with the insurance-linked securities market reaching record capacity of about USD 107 billion outstanding in 2024 and European domiciles including Malta and Luxembourg and Guernsey continuing to develop regulatory frameworks that attract captive formations and innovative risk transfer structures, providing a real-world framework for the course’s modules on risk transfer mechanisms and benefits of scale in risk management and factors affecting insurance costs and insurance placement.​

Results: Beris International confirmed that when three elements come together including the company having enough premium and loss history to support meaningful risk retention and leadership being ready to treat risk as a strategic variable rather than a fixed cost and willingness to invest in the governance and expertise needed to run an insurance company the captive can transform the relationship between operations and safety and finance with the organization deciding which risks to own and which to transfer and how to turn hard-won knowledge of its own operations into a long-term financial advantage, illustrating exactly how the course’s modules on risk transfer mechanisms and benefits of scale and factors affecting insurance costs convert energy insurance training directly into measurable competitive advantage and cost optimization for oil and gas organizations. Results confirmed that energy insurance professionals who understand captive structures and risk retention layers and reinsurance placement and catastrophe bond mechanics can design sophisticated cost-effective risk financing frameworks that go well beyond standard market placement with the captive not just being about saving money in a hard market but letting the company customize coverage for niche operational risks and retain more of the benefit from strong loss performance and build a long-term pool of capital that can support large projects and higher retentions and innovative financing structures.​

J.S. Held – Oil refinery fire: USD 500 million business interruption claim

Implementation: Peter Hagen CPA CFF Executive Vice President of Forensic Accounting Insurance Services at J.S. Held confirmed that an oil refinery in the United States suffered a major fire shutting down its Ultra Reformer UU3 which converted naphtha to high-octane reformate for use as gasoline base stock and hydrogen and liquefied petroleum gas for more than six months with the UU3 being a money-maker at the refinery and that without it the refinery was forced to sell naphtha at 60 to 70 percent of the price of gasoline, with the insured presenting a business interruption claim in excess of USD 500 million and forensic accounting experts from J.S. Held engaged by the insurer to analyze the claim and the refinery’s stated losses. The J.S. Held experts measured more than USD 100 million less in losses than the claim stated with the primary difference being in the Projected Normal Revenues the first and most critical measurement in BI claims which analyzes what revenues would have been but for the loss, with refineries not depending on budgets but being driven by linear programming LP models run at the beginning of every month when the refinery projects inputs in crude and outputs in saleable products allowing planners to identify the optimal mix of crude oil to process and products to produce based on market demands and unit constraints and by definition an LP model going to overstate the but-for revenues in a given month with the insured’s claim based on the LP model as their Projected Normal Revenues. The J.S. Held team looked at several clean months pre-fire where the refinery was running at capacity and without operational issues in projecting a variance from the LP model using the back-casting method which generated an unfavorable variance based on the analysis adjusting the claimed losses downward by nearly USD 100 million, with the insured disagreeing with the experts’ approach and presenting a major factor indicating that back-casting was not sound based primarily on the fact that in the year following the base period the refinery realized USD 1 billion in upgrades contributing to a more efficient plant.​

Results: Peter Hagen confirmed that the J.S. Held experts agreed the plant’s efficiency would have improved following the upgrades but strongly opined the refinery would still not reach 100 percent optimization of the LP model based on experience with other refineries and that J.S. Held presented their solution to the insurance market with the options being to wait for three months post-loss to measure post-upgrade performance or negotiate a settlement of the projected unfavorable variance and that the market and insured chose the latter and settled within an acceptable range for both parties, with the J.S. Held forensic accounting team along with the independent adjuster earning the respect of the insured due to knowledge of their operation and timeliness in providing monthly measures for advances and willingness to take a reasonable approach to loss measurements and that without mutual respect it is likely the file would have remained open a great deal longer potentially in litigation. Results confirmed that insurance and finance professionals who understand the mechanics of business interruption coverage including period of indemnity and gross profit calculation and increased cost of working and contingent BI and LP model variance quantification and back-casting methodology can lead or support claims of exceptional complexity and value making them indispensable to their organizations during and after major loss events, illustrating exactly the BI claims mechanics and financial analysis and loss control and claims management knowledge the course builds through its modules on onshore risks and important aspects of an insurance policy.​

Be inspired by leading energy insurance achievements. Register now to build the skills your organization needs for captive insurance structure optimization and OEE coverage gap prevention and BI forensic claims management excellence!