Construction Delay Analysis Training Course

Course Overview

This professional development program, the Construction Delay Analysis Training Course, is designed for quantity surveyors, commercial managers, construction lawyers, project managers, planning engineers, consultants, engineers switching careers, and other relevant personnel working on infrastructure, commercial, industrial, and government projects. The course is built around FIDIC‑based claim guidance and forensic schedule‑analysis practice, emphasizing that extension‑of‑time (EOT) claims must be particularized by identifying each delay cause, linking it to a defined period and to its impact on completion, and explicitly addressing concurrency so submissions are harder to reject and stronger in negotiation or dispute resolution.​

The curriculum covers introduction to construction contracts and case law, the concept of claims, types of delay, forensic schedule delay analysis, and “find the events” techniques. It then develops claims quantum and preliminaries modelling (event logs, contract and EOT prelims models, key errors), analysis of EOT claims, plant/labour/material cost claims, loss of profit and claims‑preparation costs, delay analysis techniques and contractor vs client delay events, choice of contracts, tender and acceptance risk issues, monitoring delay and disruption and prevention, formulation and presentation of claims (EOT, prolongation, disruption, acceleration, fluctuations, finance charges), response to claims and counterclaims (including liquidated damages), and avoidance, resolution, and settlement of disputes including third‑party processes and foreign award enforcement.​

Why This Course Is Required?

Particularized claim structure and strong EOT submissions are critical because FIDIC guidance stresses that delay periods must be attributed to specific causes, with cause and effect clearly linked and any concurrent delay disclosed, supported by factual evidence and coherent narrative rather than vague “global” claims. Forensic schedule analysis and delay attribution also require specialized skills, since practice distinguishes observational methods (baseline/updates/as‑built comparisons) from modeled methods such as Time Impact Analysis (TIA) and other quantitative windows‑based techniques; organizations that use the right method for their project complexity can better allocate delay responsibility and support or resist claims with credible critical‑path evidence.​

Construction delay analysis professionals must master FIDIC claim fundamentals (event logs, allocation of days by cause, linking events to completion impact, concurrent delay documentation), understand forensic schedule techniques (baseline, updates, as‑built, plan‑vs‑as‑built, windows analysis, TIA, as‑built‑but‑for modelling), and apply concurrent‑delay and entitlement principles (time vs money, liquidated damages limits, realistic negotiation posture). These capabilities support higher EOT success rates, more accurate delay‑responsibility attribution, better negotiation outcomes and reduced arbitration exposure, and a competitive advantage through disciplined cause‑and‑effect analysis, schedule‑assurance practices, and structured dispute‑resolution strategies.

Research demonstrates training is crucial for success, with FIDIC-based claim guidance highlighting successful claimants clearly separate multiple delay causes and allocate days to each and present coherent narrative linking contract clauses and events and schedule impact with course’s step-by-step work on event logs and EOT logs and supporting letters and narrative reports directly building individual capability to draft claims that satisfy these expectations rather than relying on vague or global claims that courts often criticize, while forensic-schedule articles showing effective delay analysts know when to use different methods simple plan-versus-as-built comparisons for few early impacts and more sophisticated windows or TIA approaches for complex multi-party projects with by practicing these methods in workshops and case-based exercises participants gain confidence in selecting and explaining analysis approach that clients and experts and tribunals will recognize as reasonable, and concurrent-delay studies emphasizing both contractors and owners must prove absence of concurrency to claim money but only need to show other party’s delay impacted critical path to obtain or resist time extensions with understanding these nuances equips professionals project managers and planners and quantity surveyors and lawyers to set realistic negotiation positions and avoid over-claiming and prepare more defensible positions in mediation or arbitration.

Course Objectives

Upon successful completion, participants will have demonstrated mastery of:

• Finding and organizing relevant project documents and correspondence to support delay claims
• Developing detailed event records and discussion transcripts for team reviews and client clarification
• Creating standardized templates for each delay event to structure internal analysis and external communication
• Preparing clear supporting letters for all relevant events and building a complete EOT log capturing all key data
• Writing coherent narrative reports that show cause‑and‑effect between delay events, contract clauses, schedules, and project completion dates
• Structure FIDIC‑compliant EOT claims by particularizing each delay cause, allocating its period, and clearly linking it to critical‑path impact, including explicit treatment of concurrent delay.​
• Select and apply appropriate forensic schedule‑analysis methods (baseline vs. as‑built, windows analysis, Time Impact Analysis) to quantify critical‑path slippage and attribute responsibility for delays.​
• Analyze concurrent owner and contractor delays to distinguish entitlement to time from entitlement to money, and to assess exposure to or defenses against liquidated damages.

Master construction delay analysis excellence and drive claim success. Enroll today to become a Certified Construction Delay Analysis Professional!

Training Methodology

This interactive Construction Delay Analysis Masterclass Training program comprises the following training methods:

The training framework includes:

• Lectures
• Seminars and presentations
• Group discussions
• Assignments
• Case studies and functional exercises
• Workshops developing particularized EOT claim structuring skills
• Hands-on exercises practicing forensic schedule analysis and Time Impact Analysis
• Practical demonstrations with concurrent delay scenarios and claim defense techniques

This immersive approach fosters practical skill development and real-world application of construction delay analysis principles through comprehensive coverage of claim formulation, forensic analysis, and concurrent delay management with emphasis on measurable EOT submission strength and delay attribution accuracy and negotiation success.

This program follows the Do-Review-Learn-Apply model with experienced instructors ensuring industry-relevant content through practical case studies and construction delay analysis examples, creating a structured learning journey that transforms traditional delay claim approaches into professional construction delay analysis excellence.

Who Should Attend?

This Construction Delay Analysis Training Course is designed for:

• Quantity Surveyors
• Commercial Managers
• Construction Lawyers
• Engineers Interested in Switching Careers
• Project Managers
• Planning Engineers
• Consultants
• Any other relevant personnel
• Contract administrators
• Claims specialists
• Dispute resolution professionals
• Professionals seeking construction delay analysis certification

Organizational Benefits

Organizations implementing construction delay analysis training will benefit through:

• Significantly enhanced EOT submission success and negotiation outcomes through comprehensive training delivering measurable returns where guidance on FIDIC contracts stressing extension-of-time EOT claims must be particularized with each cause of delay must be identified and linked to specific period and clearly connected to its effect on completion with concurrent delays explicitly addressed with organizations that train staff to structure claims this way can present stronger EOT submissions reducing risk of outright rejection and improving prospects for negotiated extensions and compensation exactly what training teaches
• Better delay responsibility attribution and schedule evidence credibility through forensic schedule-analysis practice distinguishing observational methods comparing baseline and updates and as-built schedules from modeled methods such as Time Impact Analysis TIA which quantitatively measure slippage on critical path over windows in time with organizations that equip project teams with these techniques can better attribute responsibility for delay and support or resist claims with credible schedule evidence and reduce risk that poorly supported programs undermine their position in negotiations or arbitration as organizational benefits highlighted in training
• Improved concurrent delay strategy and realistic claim positioning through legal and technical analysis of concurrent delay concluding when owner-caused and contractor-caused delays both affect critical path contractors are generally entitled to time but not necessarily to compensation for that concurrent period while owners lose entitlement to liquidated damages for that same timeframe with training teams to understand this distinction helps organizations adopt realistic strategies when preparing and assessing or defending claims involving concurrent delay validating course content
• Strengthened competitive advantage through comprehensive understanding of FIDIC procedures, Time Impact Analysis, concurrent delay principles, and forensic schedule assurance that enable superior construction delay analysis excellence

Studies show that organizations implementing comprehensive construction delay analysis training achieve significantly enhanced delivery outcomes as research confirms forensic schedule analysis depending on quality and reasonableness of project schedules with many change orders and claims having time-related costs which are schedule driven making project schedule key management tool for measuring project progress over time, better organizational outcomes through claim evidence demonstrating successful claimants clearly separating multiple delay causes and allocating days to each and presenting coherent narrative linking contract clauses and events and schedule impact rather than relying on vague or global claims, and improved competitive positioning as forensic schedule quality assurance approach ensures schedule models used to measure and allocate and prove schedule delay are reasonably accurate so analysis will withstand scrutiny while organizations benefit from analyzing areas of project delay and picking out and eradicating most problematic ones, helping employees identify areas where lags are occurring and techniques of convincing clients for extension of project time frames, and providing legitimate claims with sufficient information to convince clients to provide extension.

Empower your organization with construction delay analysis expertise. Enroll your team today and see the transformation in claim success and dispute resolution!

Personal Benefits

Professionals implementing construction delay analysis training will benefit through:

• Deeper understanding of particularized claim formulation and FIDIC compliance through FIDIC-based claim guidance highlighting successful claimants clearly separate multiple delay causes and allocate days to each and present coherent narrative linking contract clauses and events and schedule impact with course’s step-by-step work on event logs and EOT logs and supporting letters and narrative reports directly building individual capability to draft claims that satisfy these expectations rather than relying on vague or global claims that courts often criticize
• Enhanced forensic schedule analysis capabilities and method selection through forensic-schedule articles showing effective delay analysts know when to use different methods simple plan-versus-as-built comparisons for few early impacts and more sophisticated windows or TIA approaches for complex multi-party projects with by practicing these methods in workshops and case-based exercises participants gain confidence in selecting and explaining analysis approach that clients and experts and tribunals will recognize as reasonable
• Stronger concurrent delay understanding and negotiation positioning through concurrent-delay studies emphasizing both contractors and owners must prove absence of concurrency to claim money but only need to show other party’s delay impacted critical path to obtain or resist time extensions with understanding these nuances equips professionals project managers and planners and quantity surveyors and lawyers to set realistic negotiation positions and avoid over-claiming and prepare more defensible positions in mediation or arbitration
• Advanced expertise in cause-and-effect analysis, program schedule entitlement review, and claim quantification
• Enhanced career prospects and marketability in construction delay analysis, claims management, forensic scheduling, and dispute resolution sectors with professionals gaining skills in windows analysis, prolongation claims, and strategic planning
• Ability to understand project contracts in detailed manner
• Skills to help and empower yourself to manage time more effectively and efficiently in real-world scenarios
• Knowledge to develop strategies for defending organization against and preventing penalties as result of time delays in project completion
• Capability to identify right and most effective methods of reporting project delays
• Understanding to recognize how to estimate project delays in days if you have more than one delay event concurrently
• Expertise to know how to defend your claim and be ready for client discussions

Course Outline

MODULE 1: INTRODUCTION

• Brief History of Construction Contracts & Case Law
• Introduction to Claims
• Claims – A Holistic View
• The Concept of Claims
• Claims against Consultants
• Types of Delay
• Forensic Schedule Delay Analysis
• Find the Events
• Identifying excusable versus non-excusable delays
• Distinguishing compensable from non-compensable delay events
• Understanding critical path and float concepts in delay analysis

MODULE 2: CLAIMS QUANTUM – PRELIMINARIES MODELLING

• Collect and Record Supporting Documents
• Major Claim Headings
• Creating a Contract Model
• Creating an EOT Prelims Model
• Key Errors to Avoid
• Building a comprehensive event log with dates, causes, and effects
• Linking each delay event to specific contract clauses
• Preparing particularized claims rather than global claims

MODULE 3: ANALYSIS OF EOT CLAIM

• Analyse the Delays
• Build Your Case
• Defend Your Case
• EOT Workshop
• EOT Workshop Solution
• Using baseline and as-built schedule comparisons
• Applying windows analysis and Time Impact Analysis (TIA)
• Quantifying critical path slippage for each delay event

MODULE 4: INCREASED PLANT LABOUR AND MATERIAL COSTS

• Case Law Analysis
• Quantum Spreadsheet
• Documenting cost increases with purchase orders, invoices, and timesheets
• Linking cost escalation to specific delay periods
• Calculating direct and indirect cost impacts

MODULE 5: CLAIMS FOR LOSS OF PROFIT & RECOVERY OF CLAIMS PREPARATION COSTS

• Legal Analysis of Loss of Profit Claims
• Loss of Profit Under FIDIC & Recovery of Claims Preparation Costs
• Advanced Global Claims
• Demonstrating loss of opportunity and reduced productivity
• Supporting profit claims with financial records and contract values
• Justifying claims preparation costs as recoverable expenses

MODULE 6: WORKSHOP ASSIGNMENTS

• EOT Workshop Assignments
• Case Study Based Workshops
• Practicing delay analysis techniques on real project scenarios
• Drafting EOT notices and supporting narratives
• Peer review and critique of claims submissions

MODULE 7: EOT CLAIM AND CASE ANALYSIS

• EOT Claim Template – An Explanation
• Recovery of Banking Related Losses
• Structuring claims with clear cause-and-effect relationships
• Presenting EOT logs with supporting correspondence and schedule evidence
• Addressing concurrent delays explicitly in claim narratives

MODULE 8: DELAY ANALYSIS AND OTHER TECHNIQUES

• Delay Analysis Techniques
• Types of Delay
• Contractor Delay Events
• Client/Engineer Delay Events
• Contractor Time Claims Clause
• Client Claims Clause
• Claims Notice letters
• Cause and Effect Analysis
• Programme Schedule for Entitlement Review
• Claims Entitlement Analysis
• Claims Quantification
• Sample Delay Notice
• Selecting appropriate delay analysis methods based on project complexity
• Identifying owner-caused versus contractor-caused delays on the critical path
• Understanding entitlement to time versus entitlement to compensation

MODULE 9: CHOICE OF CONTRACTS

• Choice of Contracts
• Clients Objectives
• Contracting Methods
• Standard Forms of Contract
• Joint Ventures
• Other Forms of Contract
• Special Conditions & Contract Documents
• Risk allocation and delay liability under different contract forms
• Approaches to extension of time in common standard forms
• Reviewing contract provisions for notice requirements and time bars

MODULE 10: TENDER AND ACCEPTANCE

• Tender & Acceptance
• Selection & Pre-Qualification
• Time Allowed for Tendering
• Exploitation of Poor Tender Documents by Contractors
• Preparing the Tender
• Qualified Tenders
• Evaluation Criteria
• Rejection Acceptance & LOI
• Assessing schedule feasibility and risk during tender stage
• Identifying potential delay events in tender documents
• Building contingency and float into tender programs

MODULE 11: MONITORING DELAY AND DISRUPTION CLAIMS PREVENTION

• Monitoring Delay and Disruption of Claims & Prevention
• Possession of Site & Commencement
• Pre-Commencement Meeting
• Instructions & Drawing Issues
• Site Instructions & Verbal Instructions
• Form of Instructions
• Programme & Progress
• Notice: Records & Particulars
• Delays after the Contract Completion Date
• Minimizing Exposure to Claims & Prevention
• Maintaining contemporaneous records of delays and their impacts
• Issuing timely notices under the contract to preserve entitlement
• Using regular program updates and progress reports to support claims

MODULE 12: FORMULATION AND PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS

• Formulation & Presentation of Claims
• Notice & Presentation of Extension of Claims
• Delays after the Contract Completion Date
• Summary on Presentation of EOT Claims
• Recovery of Loss/or Expenses/ and or Damages
• Notice of Intention to Claim Financial Recompense
• Particulars & Further information to Support Claim
• Prolongation Claims
• Concurrent delays
• Disruption & Loss of Productivity
• Claims for Acceleration
• Variations
• Day Works
• Fluctuations
• Quantum Merit
• Finance Charges: Remedies for Late Payments
• Cost of Preparing the Claim
• Assessment & Evaluation
• Summary of Presentation of Claims for Additional Payment
• Quantum Merit
• Formal Claim Submission
• Particularizing each cause of delay with specific dates and durations
• Addressing concurrent delays and their impact on time and cost entitlement
• Preparing narrative reports that connect contract clauses, events, and schedule analysis

MODULE 13: RESPONSE TO CLAIMS: COUNTERCLAIMS

• Response to Claims & Counter Claims
• EOT
• Claims for Additional Payment
• Counter Claims
• Liquidated Damages
• General Damages
• Claims Against Subcontractors
• Evaluating the strength of contractor claims using schedule evidence
• Identifying defenses and counterclaims based on contractor-caused delays
• Recognizing when concurrent delays limit liquidated damages

MODULE 14: AVOIDANCE, RESOLUTION AND SETTLEMENT OF DISPUTES

• Avoidance, Resolution & Settlement of Disputes
• Claim Submission
• Negotiation
• Resolution of Disputes by Third Parties
• Enforcement of Foreign Awards
• Preparing realistic settlement positions based on entitlement analysis
• Using mediation and other ADR techniques to resolve delay disputes
• Understanding arbitration and litigation options for construction claims

Real World Examples

FIDIC projects – Particularized EOT claims and cause-effect

Implementation: FIDIC claim guidance explains that under provisions such as clause 8.4, where several causes contribute to delay, the delay period should be attributed to each cause and the contractor should state explicitly where concurrent delay exists and which delay produced more overall impact. To do this, contractors must compile factual evidence (correspondence, minutes, instructions, records) and accompany it with a narrative that references documents and explains the cause–effect chain, rather than simply attaching large volumes of letters.​

Results: Contractors on major FIDIC projects who provide particularized EOT analyses with clear allocation of delay days, logical narratives, and supporting schedule exhibits tend to achieve stronger positions with engineers and in dispute fora than those submitting global claims. Use of Excel timelines, as‑built vs baseline programs, and dated photographs makes delay events easier to follow and more persuasive, improving prospects for negotiated extensions and reducing the risk of outright rejection.​

US and UK construction disputes – forensic schedule analysis in claims

Implementation: Forensic schedule‑assurance case material from US and UK projects describes using observational methods (plan‑vs‑as‑built comparisons of baseline, updates, and as‑built schedules) and modeled methods (e.g., TIA, collapsed as‑built) to investigate and quantify critical‑path slippage and assign delay responsibility between owner and contractor. Analysts review month‑by‑month schedule updates, insert or remove delay fragnets, and examine critical‑path movement to test alternative scenarios and measure the impact of specific events.​

Results: Observational methods provide relatively quick, lower‑cost insight where there are few, early delays, while modeled methods offer more objective, structured quantification for complex, overlapping delays and are often required in litigation or arbitration because they explicitly measure critical‑path effects over time. The guidance emphasizes that method selection must consider schedule quality and project facts, since any delay analysis built on a flawed scheduling model will be suspect and potentially unreliable, underscoring the importance of schedule assurance and correct method choice exactly what this course’s forensic analysis modules address.​

International EPC and infrastructure projects – concurrent delay and entitlement

Implementation: Concurrent‑delay analysis across international EPC and infrastructure projects shows that many tribunals and protocols apply a broadly symmetrical rule: when owner‑ and contractor‑caused delays both affect the critical path over the same period, contractors are generally entitled to time but not to compensation for that concurrent period, and owners are barred from liquidated damages during the same window. US case law such as Cline Construction, and guidance from AACE International and the SCL Protocol, illustrate approaches such as “time but no money,” apportionment, and critical‑path‑based responsibility.​

Results: The “time but no money” principle means contractors can often avoid liquidated damages where owner‑responsible delay is also on the critical path but cannot recover prolongation costs for that overlapping period unless they prove absence of contractor or force‑majeure concurrency, while owners similarly cannot claim LDs when their own delays are concurrent. AACE guidance underscores that compensability requires proof of lack of concurrency, whereas excusability (time) requires only proof that the other party’s delay affected the critical path, shaping more realistic settlement strategies and informing how both sides position their claims and defenses core decision rules that this course teaches participants to apply.​

Be inspired by leading construction delay analysis achievements. Register now to build the skills your organization needs for claim excellence and dispute resolution!